The conclusion is that this latest phase of Geertz's work might be impossible to reconcile with a kind of methodological pluralism implied in his earlier works.Īfter 1945, the Republic of Poland appeared to be an ethnic monolith. The paper traces this 'interpretative' thread of Geertz's work, along with its methodological implications for the relativistic, plural perspectives, up to his writings in the 1990s, when he seems to adopt a position that there actually can be one interpretation, a specific 'master narrative' according to which 'the world' we live in can be understood. They have also been criticized, but I point to inadequacies of some of these criticisms. The concepts of the 'culture as text' and the 'semiotic concept of culture' have influenced generations of scholars.
Geertz is associated with the 'interpretative', 'postmodern' or 'literary' turn in anthropology, although he would not necessarily put himself in any of these categories. The paper examines the scope and influence of Clifford Geertz, one of the most influential social scientists in the 20th century.
0 kommentar(er)
